RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01298
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to show that he was not required to use
his civilian annual and sick leave for an injury that occurred
while serving in Inactive Duty for Training (IDT) status.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He injured his right shoulder while performing IDT. He believes
his senior leadership took his injury lightly and did not follow
procedures prescribed in Air National Guard Instruction 36-3001
or Air Force Instruction 36-2910. He should not have been
required to use his civilian annual and sick leave for the days
he was unable to work or had medical appointments.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a personal
statement, copies of medical records and numerous electronic
communications in regard to his injury and leave status.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Air National Guard (ANG)
who was transferred to the Retired Reserve List, in the grade of
staff sergeant (E-5), effective 9 July 2012. He served 25 years,
9 months, and 20 days of satisfactory service and is eligible to
draw retired pay upon turning age 60.
On 26 June 2010, while serving with the Georgia ANG, the
applicant injured his right shoulder while performing IDT duties.
A Line of Duty (LOD) determination was completed on 1 September
2010 by the Wing Appointing Authority.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in
the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary
responsibility at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPFA/MEDCON recommends the applicant provide documentation
(certified time card) highlighting the civilian leave he used and
factual documentation pertaining to the recommended approval or
denial of Incap Pay benefits to effectively determine the amount
of time he had loss of income. This amount should be offset by
the amount paid out in annual and sick leave already paid.
DPFA/MEDCON states that members, who are able to perform their
military duties and return to their civilian job, are not
continued on orders for LOD conditions; however, they may be
eligible for Incapacitation (Incap) Pay. Department of Defense
Directive 1241.01, Reserve Component Medical Care and
Incapacitation Pay for Line of Duty, authorizes medical and
dental care an provides pay and allowances for members who
demonstrate a loss of earned income as a result of an injury,
illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in the line of duty.
For medical continuation purposes, when members are able to
perform their military and civilian duties, they are not
considered incapacitated until or if they are scheduled for
surgery. The applicants surgery was scheduled several times but
cancelled due to not being approved by Tricare, or approved for
Incap Pay. Delays in leadership responding to the applicants
emails asking for assistance, the delays in submitting his LOD to
Tricare, and the completion of the Incap Pay package appear to be
the reason for multiple canceled surgeries and the start of the
applicants Incap Pay.
Subsequent to his injury, the applicant informed his leadership
that he needed surgery. At this time he was informed of the
Incap Pay program and the need to submit his LOD to the active
duty Military Treatment Facility (MTF) for Tricare to approve and
pay for his surgery. Eligibility for Incap Pay requires the LOD
to be completed. The medical documentation related to the LOD
condition is required for the process to be initiated. The
applicant indicated to his chain of command that he was not able
to make a medical appointment until 13 July 2010. The LOD was
completed on 1 September 2010. This would be the earliest the
applicant would be eligible for Incap Pay pending all other
requirements were met. On the dates he indicated he had to leave
his civilian job for medical appointments and the days he was
unable to report for duty because of pain related to his LOD
condition, his options were to either use his civilian leave
(annual and sick time), or take leave without pay. Had the
applicant taken leave without pay, he would have had loss income;
therefore, per DODD 1241.01, and his medical point of contacts
email, dated 23 February 2011, the applicant would have been
eligible for Incap Pay.
A complete copy of the DPFA/MEDCON evaluation, with attachment,
is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 23 August 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
D). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The application was timely filed.
2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took note of
the recommendation from AFPC/DPFA/MEDCON and agree that in order
to effectively determine the applicants loss of income, he must
first submit documentation supporting his loss of civilian leave
and/or pay and, provide documentation of his approval or denial
of Incapacitation Pay benefits. While it appears the applicant
has indeed suffered an error or injustice, AFPC/DPFA/MEDCON has
indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief
the applicant has not first pursued. In view of this, we find
this application is not ripe for adjudication at this level, as
there exists a subordinate level of appeal that has not first
been depleted. However, if after exhausting the available avenue
of administrative relief, the applicant believes his records are
in error or unjust, he may request reconsideration. .
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-01298 in Executive Session on 7 January 2014,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01298:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 12 Mar 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFA/MEDCON, dtd 2 Aug 13, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 23 Aug 13.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04418
On 29 Sep 12, according to AFPC/DPFA, the applicant submitted a request for MEDCON orders. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFA recommends denial of the applicants request for an orders extension or point credit, indicating the documentation submitted does not support his potential eligibility for MEDCON orders...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01410
Upon returning from his AD deployment in 2012 he was denied Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders and pay by his medical group, and he should have been considered for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). On 12 Dec 12, the Connecticut IG rendered a determination that the applicants contested injury was incurred while serving on AD, and, as he was found fit for duty, no MEDCON orders were warranted. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04415
He was also placed on MEDCON orders from 26 Nov 13 through 7 Mar 14. CMAS also reflects he was placed on MEDCON orders on 16 Sep 10 through 11 Mar 11 for his in the LOD medical condition. From 16 Sep 10 through 11 Mar 11 he was on MEDCON for his right knee, he was released from MEDCON due to medical documentation only reflecting a treatment plan for his left knee.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01087
During that time he received two in the LOD injuries. The SAF/AA policy states that airmen are entitled to be returned to active duty to satisfy pay and entitlements, medical evaluation and treatment and processing through the DES but they must have a medical diagnosis rendering them unable to perform military duties and a LOD determination documenting that the injury/illness was incurred or aggravated in the LOD. In this case, the applicant was injured on active duty but was cleared to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05587
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit B. The applicants MEDCON request was disapproved by AFPC/DPFA because her orders ended on 31 October 2013, she suffered a break in service and her LOD was not finalized in accordance with 15 August 2012 Secretary of the Air Force MEDCON Policy Guidelines. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01596
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military records be corrected to show he was in an Active Duty (AD) status from 14 Aug 13 to 16 Mar 14. The complete AFBCMR evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by stating when he returned from deployment and in-processed, he reported that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03094
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through 1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay). In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun 26 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01103
He receive military pay and Air National Guard (ANG) retirement points for the periods of time requested above. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit H. On 11 Mar 14, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, reiterating that he sustained a shoulder injury while serving on active duty due to being electrocuted when...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00118
The Medical Consultant states that the applicant may be eligible for at least periodic restoration of active duty orders to receive treatment for his medical condition on the dates he was required to take leave from his civilian employment, but finds the evidence insufficient to establish MEDCON orders along the entire continuum requested; noting the evidence suggesting that his medical condition waxed and waned while under treatment with epidural and sacroiliac steroid injections; allowing...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05257
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial, indicating the applicants initial request for MEDCON orders ended due to him failing to provide further documentation for his medical condition. Additionally, the applicant may have been receiving VA...